Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 36% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 36% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 54% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.37% points | 1.06% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 92% | 53% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | −0.5% | −3.3% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 19.5% | 8.6% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 21.1% | 7.8% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −28.9% | −15.8% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.0 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 54% | 76 · 48% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.