ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Motilal Oswal Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • SBI MIDCAP FUNDMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherMotilal Oswal MidcapSBI MIDCAPNippon India Large CapKotak Mid Cap
Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap
itself
Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 6% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI MIDCAPMid Cap
SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios
itself
SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Large Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 6% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 4% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureMotilal Oswal MidcapSBI MIDCAPNippon India Large CapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapMid CapLarge CapMid Cap
Fund houseMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P454% of 10938% of 10973% of 10983% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.37% points1.09% points1.01% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P192%80%57%not measured
Run by P7Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrsBhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 moSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsnot known
1-year return−0.5%3.8%−4.7%4.8%
3 years p.a.19.5%11.0%11.1%18.1%
5 years p.a.21.1%13.5%12.8%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−28.9%−17.9%−15.4%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹41,706 Cr₹24,349 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history4.0 yrs5.8 yrs13 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight32 · 54%64 · 28%69 · 45%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.