ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI SMALL CAP FUNDSmall Cap×
  • Nippon India Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • Quant Small Cap FundSmall Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI SMALL CAPNippon India Small CapICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Quant Small Cap
SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap
itself
SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 0% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 10% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 8% of their portfolios
Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and SBI SMALL CAP share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
Quant Small CapSmall Cap
Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 3% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: SBI SMALL CAP FUND and Nippon India Small Cap Fund share 10% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI SMALL CAPNippon India Small CapICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Quant Small Cap
CategorySmall CapSmall CapLarge CapSmall Cap
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limitedquant Money Managers Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P449% of 10990% of 10990% of 10969% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.31% points1.10% points0.81% points0.84% points
Portfolio turned over a year P154%68%45%75%
Run by P7R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 moSamir Rachh · 9.6 yrsVaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsAnkit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs
1-year return6.6%8.9%−5.3%12.7%
3 years p.a.12.3%16.1%10.6%18.5%
5 years p.a.14.2%19.0%10.9%19.2%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−22.4%−24.2%−15.4%−24.4%
Assets (AUM)₹39,942 Cr₹76,236 Cr₹80,822 Cr₹34,069 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs14 yrs13 yrs7.5 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight73 · 37%257 · 16%93 · 47%120 · 43%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.