Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI SMALL CAP | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | itself | SBI SMALL CAP and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 6% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Value share 2% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 6% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and SBI SMALL CAP share 2% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI SMALL CAP | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.31% points | 1.03% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 108% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | 6.8% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.3% | 15.9% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.2% | 15.0% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.4% | −17.3% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹39,942 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 37% | 167 · 24% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.