ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI SMALL CAP FUNDSmall Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Quant Small Cap FundSmall Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI SMALL CAPNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapQuant Small Cap
SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap
itself
SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Quant Small CapSmall Cap
Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Quant Small Cap Fund, share 4%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI SMALL CAPNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapQuant Small Cap
CategorySmall CapMid CapMid CapSmall Cap
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.quant Money Managers Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P449% of 10987% of 10983% of 10969% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.31% points0.86% points1.44% points0.84% points
Portfolio turned over a year P154%52%not measured75%
Run by P7R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 moRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot knownAnkit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs
1-year return6.6%7.0%4.8%12.7%
3 years p.a.12.3%18.6%18.1%18.5%
5 years p.a.14.2%18.0%16.8%19.2%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−22.4%−19.9%−20.9%−24.4%
Assets (AUM)₹39,942 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹34,069 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs14 yrs—7.5 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight73 · 37%105 · 25%none disclosed120 · 43%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.