Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Axis Small Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | UTI Value | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Axis Small Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and UTI Value share 7% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 29% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Axis Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Axis Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Axis Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Axis Small Cap share 29% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI Value share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Axis Small Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | UTI Value | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 42% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 37% of 109 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.44% points | 1.06% points | 0.70% points | 0.79% points | 1.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 63% | 53% | 45% | 47% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | not known | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 10.0% | −3.3% | −3.2% | −4.1% | 8.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 12.1% | 16.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.4% | 7.8% | 10.6% | 11.0% | 19.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.4% | −15.8% | −16.4% | −17.2% | −24.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹27,535 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 12 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 132 · 25% | 76 · 48% | 50 · 53% | 71 · 41% | 257 · 16% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.