Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) | Nippon India Small Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS)Uncategorised | itself | UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) and Nippon India Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios | UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) share 0% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Small Cap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI FTIF Series XVI - VII (366 DAYS) | Nippon India Small Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Small Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 90% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.27% points | 1.10% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 68% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 8.2% | 8.9% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 16.1% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 19.0% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −24.2% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.7 yrs | 14 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 5 · 100% | 257 · 16% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.