Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Kotak Banking and PSU Debt | ITI Banking & PSU Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Kotak Banking and PSU Debt | itself | 0% |
| ITI Banking & PSU Debt | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Kotak Banking and PSU Debt Fund and ITI Banking & PSU Debt Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Banking and PSU Debt | ITI Banking & PSU Debt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Banking and PSU | Banking and PSU |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 81% of 109 | 50% of 36 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.38% | 0.58% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Laukik Bagwe · 1.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.6% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹5,074 Cr | ₹34 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 16 · 89% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.