Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | itself | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 36% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 23% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 10% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 17% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 36% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 91% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 96% of 27 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 1.10% points | 1.15% points | 1.17% points | 1.28% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 29% | 68% | 81% | 68% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.1% | 8.9% | 0.2% | −1.1% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.8% | 16.1% | 12.9% | 10.4% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.5% | 19.0% | 13.3% | 12.8% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −11.0% | −24.2% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −19.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.46 lakh Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.0 yrs | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 116 · 52% | 257 · 16% | 41 · 52% | 68 · 47% | 80 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.