Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | itself | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 2% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 21% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 2% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 17% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 17% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 21% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Mid Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 91% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 40% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 0.86% points | 0.68% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 29% | 52% | 41% |
| Run by P7 | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.1% | 7.0% | −2.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.8% | 18.6% | 8.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.5% | 18.0% | 4.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −11.0% | −19.9% | −20.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.46 lakh Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.0 yrs | 14 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 116 · 52% | 105 · 25% | 62 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.