ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI BSE SENSEX ETFOther ETFs×
  • Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs×
  • ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFOther ETFs×
  • SBI Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI BSE SENSEX ETFNippon India Silver ETFICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFSBI Nifty 50 ETF
SBI BSE SENSEX ETFOther ETFs
itself
SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 100% of their portfolios
SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios
Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs
Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 0% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Silver ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFOther ETFs
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 100% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 83% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
SBI Nifty 50 ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 83% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 100% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI BSE SENSEX ETFNippon India Silver ETFICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFSBI Nifty 50 ETF
CategoryOther ETFsOther ETFsOther ETFsOther ETFs
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P421% of 10985% of 2045% of 1092% of 99
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Portfolio turned over a year P131%not measured31%32%
Run by P7Viral Chhadva · 7 moVikram Dhawan · 4.5 yrsNishit Patel · 5.7 yrsViral Chhadva · 7 mo
1-year return−8.0%74.8%−8.0%−6.1%
3 years p.a.5.3%46.3%5.3%7.0%
5 years p.a.6.1%—6.1%7.1%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−16.1%−44.4%−16.1%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹1.22 lakh Cr₹30,898 Cr₹32,675 Cr₹2.14 lakh Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs4.6 yrs10 yrs5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight32 · 64%4 · 100%32 · 64%52 · 53%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.