ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • SBI BSE SENSEX ETFOther ETFs×
  • Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030Other ETFs · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI BSE SENSEX ETFBharat Bond ETF - April 2030Nippon India Silver ETF
SBI BSE SENSEX ETFOther ETFs
itself
SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030
SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios
Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030Other ETFs
Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030
itself
Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and Nippon India Silver ETF: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030
Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs
Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Silver ETF and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI BSE SENSEX ETFBharat Bond ETF - April 2030Nippon India Silver ETF
CategoryOther ETFsOther ETFsOther ETFs
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P421% of 1090% of 4685% of 20
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measurednot measurednot measured
Portfolio turned over a year P131%not measurednot measured
Run by P7Viral Chhadva · 7 monot knownVikram Dhawan · 4.5 yrs
1-year return−8.0%4.9%74.8%
3 years p.a.5.3%7.5%46.3%
5 years p.a.6.1%6.5%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−16.1%−1.1%−44.4%
Assets (AUM)₹1.22 lakh Cr₹24,942 Cr₹30,898 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs—4.6 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight32 · 64%none disclosed4 · 100%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.