Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
2 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|
| IDBI Liquid Fund Growth DirectUncategorised | itself | IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct: no portfolio disclosed for IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct | itself |
IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | IDBI Liquid Fund Growth Direct | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Value |
| Fund house | UNKNOWN | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 58% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 4.6% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.4% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹376 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.