Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Union Short Term | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Short TermUncategorised | itself | Union Short Term and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Union Short Term | Union Short Term and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Union Short Term |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Union Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Union Short Term | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Union Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Union Short Term | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, HDFC Mid Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund), share 5%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Union Short Term has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Union Short Term | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Mid Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Union Asset Management Company Private Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 66% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.10% points | 0.92% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 38% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.5% | 6.6% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.3% | 17.6% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 18.9% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −16.8% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 10 mo | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 81 · 37% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.