Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| PGIM India Dynamic Term | Kotak Dynamic Term | |
|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Dynamic Term | itself | 0% |
| Kotak Dynamic Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: PGIM India Dynamic Term Fund and Kotak Dynamic Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | PGIM India Dynamic Term | Kotak Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 109 | 99% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.19% | 0.78% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.0% | 7.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −1.9% | −2.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹83 Cr | ₹2,409 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.