Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Dynamic Term fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Axis Dynamic Term | Nippon India Dynamic Term | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Dynamic TermDynamic Term | itself | Axis Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 1% of their portfolios | Axis Dynamic Term and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 6% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Dynamic TermDynamic Term | Nippon India Dynamic Term and Axis Dynamic Term share 1% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Dynamic Term and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Dynamic TermDynamic Term | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and Axis Dynamic Term share 6% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Axis Dynamic Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Axis Dynamic Term | Nippon India Dynamic Term | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term |
| Fund house | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 77% of 109 | 19% of 109 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.67% points | 0.57% points | 0.54% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 1% | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Vivek Sharma · 6.2 yrs | Manish Banthia · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.4% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.4% | 7.2% | 7.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.2% | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −1.3% | −1.5% | −1.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,040 Cr | ₹3,911 Cr | ₹13,261 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 14 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 58 · 61% | 100 · 40% | 98 · 39% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.