ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Axis Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Mirae Asset Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherAxis MidcapNippon India Large CapMirae Asset Large CapKotak Mid Cap
Axis MidcapMid Cap
itself
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios
Axis Midcap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios
Axis Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios
itself
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 59% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureAxis MidcapNippon India Large CapMirae Asset Large CapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapLarge CapMid Cap
Fund houseAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. LtdKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P444% of 10973% of 10964% of 10983% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.36% points1.01% points1.06% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P180%57%53%not measured
Run by P7not knownSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsGaurav Misra · 7.7 yrsnot known
1-year return6.9%−4.7%−3.3%4.8%
3 years p.a.17.1%11.1%8.6%18.1%
5 years p.a.13.5%12.8%7.8%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−19.5%−15.4%−15.8%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹32,454 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹38,599 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history5.9 yrs13 yrs5.1 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight91 · 30%69 · 45%76 · 48%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.