ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Invesco India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE FUNDArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India ArbitrageICICI Prudential ArbitrageInvesco India ArbitrageADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE
Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
Nippon India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 47% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 50% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 51% of their portfolios
Invesco India ArbitrageArbitrage
Invesco India Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 47% of their portfolios
Invesco India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
itself
Invesco India Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 50% of their portfolios
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGEArbitrage
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and Nippon India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and Invesco India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund and Invesco India Arbitrage Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India ArbitrageICICI Prudential ArbitrageInvesco India ArbitrageADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedInvesco Asset Management (India) Private LimitedAditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 109100% of 10993% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.70% points0.60% points0.66% points0.68% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1118%128%233%86%
Run by P7Rohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrsNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrsDeepak Gupta · ≥ 1 moKrina Mehta · ≥ 6 mo
1-year return6.8%6.7%6.9%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.3%7.5%7.5%
5 years p.a.6.8%6.7%7.1%6.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.4%−0.4%−0.4%−0.5%
Assets (AUM)₹16,560 Cr₹34,536 Cr₹24,108 Cr₹26,997 Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs10 yrs11 yrs8.3 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight184 · 45%205 · 41%582 · 113%208 · 35%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.