ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Canara Robeco Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Motilal Oswal Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherCanara Robeco Large CapMotilal Oswal MidcapKotak Mid CapNippon India Large Cap
Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap
itself
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 12% of their portfolios
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios
itself
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 6% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 6% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 63% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureCanara Robeco Large CapMotilal Oswal MidcapKotak Mid CapNippon India Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapMid CapMid CapLarge Cap
Fund houseCanara Robeco Asset Management Company LimitedMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P472% of 10954% of 10983% of 10973% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.38% points1.37% points1.44% points1.01% points
Portfolio turned over a year P140%92%not measured57%
Run by P7Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrsRakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrsnot knownSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs
1-year return−4.0%−0.5%4.8%−4.7%
3 years p.a.10.4%19.5%18.1%11.1%
5 years p.a.9.0%21.1%16.8%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.8%−28.9%−20.9%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹17,092 Cr₹41,706 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹52,344 Cr
Disclosed history4.8 yrs4.0 yrs—13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight63 · 47%32 · 54%none disclosed69 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.