Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Canara Robeco Large Cap | SBI MIDCAP | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 1% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 1% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and UTI Value share 9% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Canara Robeco Large Cap | SBI MIDCAP | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 72% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.38% points | 1.09% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 40% | 80% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.0% | 3.8% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 11.0% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 9.0% | 13.5% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.8% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.8 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 63 · 47% | 64 · 28% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.