ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Canara Robeco Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Quant Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherCanara Robeco Large CapNippon India Multi CapQuant Multi CapNippon India Large Cap
Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap
itself
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 39% of their portfolios
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap
Nippon India Multi Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios
Nippon India Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 55% of their portfolios
Quant Multi CapMulti Cap
Quant Multi Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios
itself
Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 55% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 63% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureCanara Robeco Large CapNippon India Multi CapQuant Multi CapNippon India Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapMulti CapMulti CapLarge Cap
Fund houseCanara Robeco Asset Management Company LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limitedquant Money Managers LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P472% of 10950% of 10973% of 10973% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.38% points0.84% points0.93% points1.01% points
Portfolio turned over a year P140%66%88%57%
Run by P7Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrsSailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrsAnkit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs
1-year return−4.0%−1.4%4.9%−4.7%
3 years p.a.10.4%13.5%10.5%11.1%
5 years p.a.9.0%16.4%11.7%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.8%−18.6%−25.3%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹17,092 Cr₹53,760 Cr₹7,717 Cr₹52,344 Cr
Disclosed history4.8 yrs14 yrs6.9 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight63 · 47%123 · 29%74 · 53%69 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.