Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and DSP Midcap share 15% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 16% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and DSP Midcap share 36% of their portfolios |
| DSP MidcapMid Cap | DSP Midcap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 15% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 36% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and DSP Midcap Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 72% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 43% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.38% points | 0.86% points | 1.02% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 40% | 52% | 56% |
| Run by P7 | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.0% | 7.0% | 3.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.6% | 14.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 9.0% | 18.0% | 11.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.8% | −19.9% | −21.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹20,871 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 63 · 47% | 105 · 25% | 66 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.