Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Small Cap | itself | 16% |
| BANDHAN Small Cap | 16% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Small Cap Fund and BANDHAN Small Cap Fund share 16% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 90% of 109 | 75% of 44 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% | 2.00% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 8.9% | 10.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.1% | 25.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.0% | 20.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.2% | −22.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 4.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 257 · 16% | 265 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.