Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Credit Risk Fund (Existing Number of Segregated Portfolios - 1) | SBI CREDIT RISK | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Credit Risk Fund (Existing Number of Segregated Portfolios - 1) | itself | 6% |
| SBI CREDIT RISK | 6% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Credit Risk Fund (Existing Number of Segregated Portfolios - 1) and SBI CREDIT RISK FUND share 6% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Credit Risk Fund (Existing Number of Segregated Portfolios - 1) | SBI CREDIT RISK |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Credit Risk | Credit Risk |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 39% of 109 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.81% | 0.70% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Sushil Budhia · 6.5 yrs | Lokesh Mallya · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 7.9% | 8.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.9% | 8.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.9% | 7.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,450 Cr | ₹2,180 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 63 · 38% | 46 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.