Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | Kotak Large & Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | itself | 0% |
| Kotak Large & Mid Cap | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund and Kotak Large & Mid Cap Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | Kotak Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 85% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.08% | 1.34% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 83% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Neelesh Surana · 16 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.3% | 13.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.8% | 13.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.5% | −18.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹44,748 Cr | ₹30,228 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 86 · 32% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.