Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | itself | 25% |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | 25% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund and ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund share 25% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.08% | 1.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 83% | 113% |
| Run by P7 | Neelesh Surana · 16 yrs | Gaurav Jain · 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 2.6% | 0.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.3% | 15.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.8% | 14.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.5% | −14.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹44,748 Cr | ₹33,351 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 86 · 32% | 123 · 31% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.