Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Franklin India Income Opportunities Fund (no. of segregated portfolios- 2) | Union Medium Duration | |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin India Income Opportunities Fund (no. of segregated portfolios- 2) | itself | 0% |
| Union Medium Duration | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Franklin India Income Opportunities Fund (no. of segregated portfolios- 2) and Union Medium Duration Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Franklin India Income Opportunities Fund (no. of segregated portfolios- 2) | Union Medium Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Medium Duration | Medium Duration |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 48% of 52 | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.76% | 0.31% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Anindya Sarkar · 4.4 yrs |
| 1-year return | 15.5% | 8.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.7% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹25 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.7 yrs | 7 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 1 · 100% | 9 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.