Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Axis Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 53% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Axis Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Axis Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 53% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 53% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Axis Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap | Large Cap |
| Fund house | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 47% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.21% points | 1.10% points | 2.00% points | 1.01% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 73% | 68% | 68% | 57% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.2% | 8.9% | 10.4% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.2% | 16.1% | 25.3% | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.8% | 19.0% | 20.0% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.5% | −24.2% | −22.8% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 14 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 49 · 48% | 257 · 16% | 265 · 30% | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.