Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Flexi Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Flexi Cap share 30% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Flexi CapFlexi Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and HDFC Flexi Cap Fund share 30% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Flexi Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Value | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 45% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 1.17% points | 0.81% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 68% | 48% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −1.6% | −1.1% | 0.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 10.4% | 15.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 12.8% | 16.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.3% | −17.9% | −13.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹1.13 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 4.9 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 68 · 47% | 86 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.