Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | SBI FLEXICAP and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 20% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 20% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI FLEXICAP FUND and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund share 20% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | SBI Funds Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 45% of 109 | 58% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 1.03% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 129% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.6% | −2.1% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 8.6% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 8.2% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.3% | −16.0% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹22,888 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.8 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 71 · 36% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.