Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Flexi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 26% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Value share 26% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 26% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Flexi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Value | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 45% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 40% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 0.82% points | 0.68% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 82% | 41% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.6% | −2.8% | −2.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 14.0% | 8.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 13.4% | 4.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.3% | −17.6% | −20.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 94 · 36% | 62 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.