Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Canara Robeco Short Term Fund (Old) | ICICI Prudential Medium Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Canara Robeco Short Term Fund (Old) | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Medium Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Canara Robeco Short Term Fund (Old) and ICICI Prudential Medium Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Canara Robeco Short Term Fund (Old) | ICICI Prudential Medium Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Medium Term | Medium Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.76% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Manish Banthia · 9.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | — | 7.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 8.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 7.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −0.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | — | ₹5,477 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 7.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 106 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.