Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term | itself | 11% |
| ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | 11% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 74% of 109 | 98% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.53% | 0.13% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Vivek Sharma · 6.5 yrs | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.5% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,356 Cr | ₹21,200 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 2.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 112 · 26% | 139 · 27% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.