ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Bandhan Value FundValue×
  • HSBC Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherBandhan ValueHSBC ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)
Bandhan ValueValue
itself
Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios
HSBC ValueValue
HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios
itself
HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios
HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Value share 27% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureBandhan ValueHSBC ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)
CategoryValueValueMid CapValue
Fund houseBandhan AMC LimitedHSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P467% of 109100% of 1187% of 10968% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.17% points1.12% points0.86% points0.83% points
Portfolio turned over a year P168%75%52%58%
Run by P7Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrsVenugopal Manghat · 14 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsDharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs
1-year return−1.1%2.4%7.0%−5.4%
3 years p.a.10.4%15.9%18.6%11.5%
5 years p.a.12.8%—18.0%13.5%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.9%−19.6%−19.9%−14.0%
Assets (AUM)₹10,051 Cr₹15,373 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹60,800 Cr
Disclosed history4.9 yrs3.8 yrs14 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight68 · 47%86 · 32%105 · 25%66 · 52%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.