Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and HDFC Small Cap share 1% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | HDFC Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 1% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Bandhan Value Fund and HDFC Small Cap Fund, share 1%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.62% points | 1.25% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 46% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.2% | −2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 17.3% | 11.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | — | 14.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −21.0% | −22.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹42,162 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 87 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.