Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Large Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Tata Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 44% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Large Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.01% points | 2.00% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 57% | 68% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −4.7% | 10.4% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 11.1% | 25.3% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 12.8% | 20.0% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −15.4% | −22.8% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 13 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 69 · 45% | 265 · 30% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.