Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 44% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.01% points | 0.70% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 57% | 45% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −4.7% | −3.2% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 11.1% | 9.1% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 12.8% | 10.6% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −15.4% | −16.4% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 13 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 69 · 45% | 50 · 53% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.