Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 36% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 30% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 36% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.82% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 82% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −2.8% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 14.0% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.4% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −17.6% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 94 · 36% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.