Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 19% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Bandhan Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 17% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 17% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 40% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.68% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 41% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −2.3% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 8.4% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 4.9% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.1% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 62 · 44% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.