Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Quant Multi Cap | Axis Multicap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Quant Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Multicap share 14% of their portfolios |
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | Quant Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 10% of their portfolios |
| Axis MulticapMulti Cap | Axis Multicap and Bandhan Value share 14% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and Quant Multi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Axis Multicap Fund share 14% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Quant Multi Cap | Axis Multicap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | quant Money Managers Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 100% of 22 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.93% points | 1.45% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 88% | 96% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.9% | 9.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 10.5% | 20.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 11.7% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −25.3% | −18.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹9,775 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 6.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 74 · 53% | 114 · 23% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.