Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Bandhan 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandhan 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | itself | 71% |
| ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | 71% | itself |
Most alike: Bandhan 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt Fund and ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt Fund share 71% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 10-year Constant Maturity Gilt | 10-year Constant Maturity Gilt |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 62% of 109 | 78% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.17% | 0.21% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Harshal Joshi · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Manish Banthia · 2.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 7.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −2.9% | −2.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹310 Cr | ₹1,987 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8 mo | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 9 · 100% | 10 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.