Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | |
|---|---|---|
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap | itself | 33% |
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | 33% | itself |
Most alike: Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund share 33% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Large & Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.50% | 1.08% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 166% | 83% |
| Run by P7 | Manish Gunwani · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Neelesh Surana · 16 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.2% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.9% | 10.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −19.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹19,777 Cr | ₹44,748 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 136 · 27% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.