ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • HDFC Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)HDFC Mid CapTata ValueNippon India Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and HDFC Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Large Cap share 55% of their portfolios
HDFC Mid CapMid Cap
HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 4% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Value share 7% of their portfolios
HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios
Tata ValueValue
Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios
Tata Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios
itself
Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 55% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 55% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)HDFC Mid CapTata ValueNippon India Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapMid CapValueLarge Cap
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedTata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P490% of 10966% of 10963% of 10973% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.81% points0.92% points1.15% points1.01% points
Portfolio turned over a year P145%38%81%57%
Run by P7Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsnot knownSonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs
1-year return−5.3%6.6%0.2%−4.7%
3 years p.a.10.6%17.6%12.9%11.1%
5 years p.a.10.9%18.9%13.3%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−15.4%−16.8%−20.9%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹80,822 Cr₹1.07 lakh Cr₹8,440 Cr₹52,344 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs10 mo11 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight93 · 47%81 · 37%41 · 52%69 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.