ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • SBI Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Tata ValueNippon India ValueSBI Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and SBI Large Cap share 52% of their portfolios
Tata ValueValue
Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios
itself
Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios
Tata Value and SBI Large Cap share 20% of their portfolios
Nippon India ValueValue
Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 37% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Value and SBI Large Cap share 33% of their portfolios
SBI Large CapLarge Cap
SBI Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 52% of their portfolios
SBI Large Cap and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios
SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 33% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and SBI Large Cap Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Tata ValueNippon India ValueSBI Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapValueValueLarge Cap
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedTata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P490% of 10963% of 10993% of 10945% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.81% points1.15% points0.82% points0.93% points
Portfolio turned over a year P145%81%82%59%
Run by P7Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsSonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moMeenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsSaurabh Pant · ≥ 3 mo
1-year return−5.3%0.2%−2.8%−1.6%
3 years p.a.10.6%12.9%14.0%9.2%
5 years p.a.10.9%13.3%13.4%9.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−15.4%−20.9%−17.6%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹80,822 Cr₹8,440 Cr₹8,875 Cr₹55,417 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs11 yrs12 yrs5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight93 · 47%41 · 52%94 · 36%57 · 47%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.