ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Axis Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Tata ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Axis Large Cap share 54% of their portfolios
Tata ValueValue
Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios
itself
Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Tata Value and Axis Large Cap share 21% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 12% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Axis Large CapLarge Cap
Axis Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 54% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Axis Large Cap Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Tata ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapValueMid CapLarge Cap
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedTata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P490% of 10963% of 10987% of 10947% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.81% points1.15% points0.86% points1.21% points
Portfolio turned over a year P145%81%52%73%
Run by P7Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsSonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot known
1-year return−5.3%0.2%7.0%−3.2%
3 years p.a.10.6%12.9%18.6%9.2%
5 years p.a.10.9%13.3%18.0%5.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−15.4%−20.9%−19.9%−15.5%
Assets (AUM)₹80,822 Cr₹8,440 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹30,395 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs11 yrs14 yrs5.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight93 · 47%41 · 52%105 · 25%49 · 48%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.