Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aditya Birla Sun Life ValueValue | itself | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 26% of their portfolios | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 33% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 26% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 65% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 33% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 65% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 65% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap |
| Fund house | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 64% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% points | 1.38% points | 1.06% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 40% | 53% |
| Run by P7 | Kunal Sangoi · ≥ 6 mo | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 11.6% | −4.0% | −3.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.9% | 10.4% | 8.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.3% | 9.0% | 7.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.3% | −14.8% | −15.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6,719 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8.9 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 70 · 32% | 63 · 47% | 76 · 48% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.