Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | SBI MIDCAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 9% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund, share 9%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | SBI MIDCAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 64% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 38% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.06% points | 1.37% points | 1.09% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 53% | 92% | 80% |
| Run by P7 | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | −3.3% | −0.5% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 19.5% | 11.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.8% | 21.1% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.8% | −28.9% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 76 · 48% | 32 · 54% | 64 · 28% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.