Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 37% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Value | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 64% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 96% of 27 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.06% points | 1.17% points | 1.28% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 53% | 68% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.3% | −1.1% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 10.4% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.8% | 12.8% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.8% | −17.9% | −19.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 76 · 48% | 68 · 47% | 80 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.