Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 59% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Value | Value | Large Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 64% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.06% points | 1.15% points | 0.82% points | 1.01% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 53% | 81% | 82% | 57% |
| Run by P7 | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.3% | 0.2% | −2.8% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 12.9% | 14.0% | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.8% | 13.3% | 13.4% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.8% | −20.9% | −17.6% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 76 · 48% | 41 · 52% | 94 · 36% | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.