Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund (no. of segregated portfolio-1) | Motilal Oswal Ultra Short Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund (no. of segregated portfolio-1) | itself | 0% |
| Motilal Oswal Ultra Short Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund (no. of segregated portfolio-1) and Motilal Oswal Ultra Short Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund (no. of segregated portfolio-1) | Motilal Oswal Ultra Short Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short Duration | Ultra Short Duration |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 95% of 60 | 0% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.52% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 10.7% | 6.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.9% | 6.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.3% | 5.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −0.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,595 Cr | ₹520 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.4 yrs | 8.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 114 · 41% | 22 · 54% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.